To assess your knowledge and skills in government and politics, answer these sample multiple-choice questions. Here are some questions on the scenario or text-based questions regarding the court and free press. It is a passage from the Supreme Court’s opinion regarding a libel lawsuit filed by Jerry Falwell, a television evangelist and religious leader, against Larry Flynt, a publisher of a filthy pornographic magazine. Flynt had published an over-the-top parody insulting Flynt. The correct answers will appear below the questions after a brief delay.
1. Based on the Court’s opinion, which of the following would the authors agree with?
(A) Opinions and insults are not needed in public discourse.
(B) The First Amendment protects the press when lying about others.
(C) Public figures are less protected from harsh language and ridicule than average citizens.
(D) When speech is gross and repugnant to an obvious majority, then government can punish or suppress it.
2. Which of the following ideological perspectives parallels this passage?
(A) If speech or an expression of ideas hurts someone, government should prevent it.
(B) We cannot chill the First Amendment as this will limit a free flow of ideas.
(C) A state or local government should be able to define what is lewd and offensive.
(D) If a jury can punish individuals and the press for this kind of smut, people and publications would be nicer.
And the answers are . . .
Photo/Image: White House photo, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library